PLC Simulator
PLC field notesopenplc

OpenPLC vs Paid PLC Software: Honest Comparison

Compare OpenPLC with paid PLC software by runtime, editor, hardware support, simulation, learning workflow and cost to choose the right fit.

PLC Simulation Software9 min read

OpenPLC vs paid alternatives — when each wins

OpenPLC is an open-source IEC 61131-3 runtime created by Thiago Alves and maintained by a community of industrial automation researchers and practitioners. It's genuinely excellent at what it does: executing standard IEC code on cheap hardware (Raspberry Pi, Arduino, ESP32, x86 Linux) with full source-code transparency.

It's also not a complete learning platform on its own. If you're trying to decide between OpenPLC and a paid simulator, the honest answer is: they solve different problems. This post explains which problem is yours.

What OpenPLC actually is

OpenPLC has two main pieces:

  1. OpenPLC Runtime — a soft PLC. Install on a Pi, Arduino, or Linux box. It executes compiled IEC 61131-3 programs (ladder, ST, SFC, FBD, IL) with real scan-cycle semantics.
  2. OpenPLC Editor — the IDE. Desktop application, free, supports the IEC 61131-3 languages, compiles to the runtime.

There's a third piece — OpenPLC Simulator — which is the runtime running in your browser for demonstration purposes. It's modest in scope.

What OpenPLC does not include:

  • Machine physics models (traffic lights, conveyors, tank systems)
  • Automated test cases with grading
  • Interview prep tracks
  • Per-scenario solution programs
  • Portfolio PDF generation
  • Multi-dialect editor (you use IEC only)
  • Cohort management for instructors

Those aren't criticisms. They're scope. OpenPLC is a runtime; curriculum-led simulators are a learning platform.

OpenPLC's biggest strength: deployment

Once your code works in OpenPLC, you can deploy it to a USD 50 Raspberry Pi wired to real sensors and see your ladder control real things. That's the single biggest thing OpenPLC does that browser simulators can't.

If your goal is "I want to automate my home workshop" or "I want to deploy my code on cheap hardware for a hobbyist project," OpenPLC is the answer. No paid simulator deploys to real hardware.

OpenPLC's biggest limitation: no guided curriculum

If you're starting from zero and don't already know ladder logic, OpenPLC won't teach you. There's no sequenced curriculum, no graded scenarios, no "here's what to learn next." You're on your own for structure.

Self-motivated experienced programmers treat this as freedom. Beginners usually treat it as frustration.

OpenPLC vs our paid simulator, head-to-head

OpenPLC vs paid simulators — what each is good at

Reference tableSwipe
DimensionOpenPLCOur Pro plan
CostFreeUSD 249/year
RuntimeReal IEC 61131-3Real IEC 61131-3
DialectsIEC onlyIEC + A-B + Siemens + Delta
Machine scenariosNone (build your own)40 built-in
Graded testsNoneAuto-graded, pass/fail
Solutions visibleN/AYes, per scenario
Interview prepNone6 tracks with certificates
Deploys to hardwareYes, Pi / ArduinoNo
Install requiredYesNo (browser-only)
CurriculumNone18 lessons + 12 quizzes
Portfolio PDFNoYes

OpenPLC wins on deployment and cost. Our simulator wins on everything curriculum-related. They're complementary, not competitive.

The hybrid stack most people should use

The hybrid stack that uses both

Five-step path that combines both tools:

  1. Learn on our simulator. Start with the free tier, move to Basic or Pro if you're serious. Build the ladder-logic and IEC fluency.
  2. Build portfolio with graded tests. Complete a focused scenario set, then use Pro portfolio export for the work you want employers to review.
  3. Deploy code to OpenPLC on a Pi. Install the runtime, compile one of your scenarios' solution programs against it, see it run on real hardware.
  4. Wire the Pi to sensors. Buttons, LEDs, a motor driver, a temperature sensor. The I/O stack is standard GPIO plus some cheap expansion boards.
  5. Show an end-to-end demo. A working physical project driven by your code. Record a video. Paste it into your CV.

Total cost: USD 99–249/year for the simulator + USD 80–150 for a Pi and basic components. Outperforms every vendor classroom on skill-per-dollar.

Who should skip the paid simulator

Who should pick OpenPLC-only

Five scenarios where OpenPLC alone is enough:

  • You already know ladder logic and just want a runtime to deploy code on.
  • You're a hobbyist building home-automation or maker projects.
  • You're at an institution with literally zero software budget, and have an experienced instructor to supply the curriculum.
  • Your end target is Pi / Arduino / ESP32 deployment rather than employment at a traditional plant.
  • You prefer tinkering to structured learning — some people genuinely learn better by debugging OpenPLC than by passing auto-graded tests.

If any two of those are true, OpenPLC alone works. Otherwise, pair it with a structured simulator for the curriculum half.

Who should skip OpenPLC

  • Complete beginners. Without the machine physics and graded tests, OpenPLC is an empty room with an excellent PA system. Not useful until you know the concepts.
  • People targeting employment in traditional plants. The paid route (simulator + vendor classroom later) is faster.
  • Cohorts that need admin tracking. OpenPLC has no teacher dashboard.

Other open-source alternatives

  • Beremiz — the predecessor to OpenPLC's editor. Still maintained independently. Solid for serious open-source work.
  • MatIEC — the IEC 61131-3 compiler that OpenPLC uses under the hood. Library, not an IDE.
  • Mosaic (CDX Automation) — commercial but with a free community edition. Less polished than OpenPLC.

None of these are better choices than OpenPLC for most use cases. Stick with OpenPLC as the open-source reference.

How serious is the OpenPLC community

Active, international, and professional. The project is used in research papers, industrial cybersecurity tooling, and small-scale commercial deployments. The book "Introduction to Programmable Logic Controllers" and several university courses reference OpenPLC. If you contribute meaningful code, it's a resume line.

FAQ

Is OpenPLC really free?

Yes. Apache 2.0 license. Commercial use permitted. No hidden tiers.

Is OpenPLC as good as a commercial PLC runtime?

For learning and hobbyist use: yes. For production deployments in safety-critical or regulated industries: not certified, so no. Use commercial runtimes there.

Can OpenPLC replace Codesys?

Not directly. Codesys is a mature ecosystem with vendor partnerships (WAGO, Beckhoff) that ship Codesys-based hardware. OpenPLC is a runtime you deploy to commodity hardware. Different markets.

Does OpenPLC support Allen-Bradley or Siemens syntax?

No. OpenPLC is strictly IEC 61131-3. For A-B or Siemens syntax practice, use our dialect toggle.

Can I run a business on OpenPLC?

Technically yes. Practically, you'll want commercial support contracts for any real deployment — which OpenPLC doesn't directly sell, though consultants in the ecosystem do.

Where to start

  1. If you're new to PLCs: run the guided first program, then use the free tier and finish two beginner scenarios before comparing larger toolchains.
  2. If you're already fluent: install OpenPLC Editor and OpenPLC Runtime on a Pi. Compile the solution program from one of our scenarios. Deploy. Celebrate.
  3. Either way: combine the two. The simulator for curriculum, OpenPLC for deployment.

The two tools make each other more useful. Pick the entry point that matches your current level.

ShareX / TwitterLinkedIn

From reading to running logic

Practice this yourself in the simulator

Start with guided PLC practice in your browser. No install and no credit card required.

Start practising free

Continue learning

Related field notes

All articles
codesys
comparison

CODESYS vs a Browser PLC Simulator: Which Fits?

Compare CODESYS with a browser PLC simulator by runtime, hardware targets, IEC languages, graded practice, installation and learning workflow.

8 min read
comparison
simulator

Best PLC Simulator in 2026: An Honest, Tested Ranking

A detailed, tested ranking of PLC simulators in 2026 — our own, OpenPLC, Codesys, PLC Fiddle, LogixPro, vendor demos, and the rest. Covers real IEC 61131-3 compliance, graded assessments, dialect coverage, and whether each tool actually teaches you to program a PLC.

12 min read
logixpro
comparison

LogixPro vs Modern PLC Simulators: Is It Still Worth Buying in 2026?

LogixPro shipped in 2002 and changed how PLC programming was taught. Twenty-four years later, modern browser-first simulators have overtaken it on nearly every axis. Here's an honest comparison — when LogixPro still makes sense, and when a newer tool does more for less.

8 min read

Software evaluation field guide

OpenPLC versus paid PLC software: evaluation checklist

Direct answer

The evaluator can separate runtime deployment, engineering workflow, machine simulation, curriculum, target support and commercial responsibility before choosing.

Written for learners, makers, educators and controls teams deciding between an open runtime, a guided simulator and a commercial vendor toolchain.

System map / 02

NODE 01observable

Requirement

Whether the requirement is IEC learning, low-cost deployment, machine simulation, vendor hardware or structured assessment.

NODE 02observable

Test job

Editor, compiler, runtime, target hardware, I/O, protocol, curriculum, support and license responsibilities.

NODE 03observable

Baseline result

One IEC program compiled or executed with equivalent acceptance behavior.

NODE 04observable

Stress case

Library, device, operating-system, maintenance, security, documentation and deployment limits.

NODE 05observable

Failure handling

A compile, target, I/O, runtime or support gap revealed by the representative case.

NODE 06observable

Decision record

A hybrid or single-tool decision recorded with owner, evidence, total cost and production validation.