PLC Simulator

← For teams & institutions

For universities

PLC Training Software for University Engineering Departments and Control Systems Labs

Mechanical, electrical, and mechatronics departments know the problem: 12 to 16 rigs, 100 or more students, timetabling that is a patchwork of shifts and rotations. The result is uneven contact hours across a cohort sitting the same exam and the same job market. A browser-based simulator removes the constraint entirely.

Run your first PLC program — no signupRequest a free pilot

Join 13300+ learners practicing PLC programming

Setting up a university cohort? Create a free account, set up your team, or request institutional pricing.

The problem

Constraints that limit what you can teach

Hardware procurement cycles measured in years

An industrial training rig runs into five figures USD once you add a programming terminal, guarding, and power distribution. Procurement, approval, and delivery commonly takes 12 to 24 months at most institutions. The students who motivated the purchase may have graduated before a single rung is written on the new equipment.

Proprietary software licenses built for industry, not academia

Studio 5000, TIA Portal, and GX Works are priced for industrial customers. Per-seat industrial pricing applied to a 100-student module is not viable. Version management across a heterogeneous lab adds further overhead that falls on academic staff rather than IT.

No accommodation for students with remote or hybrid study status

Distance learners, students on work-integrated learning placements, and postgraduate researchers cannot access physical lab equipment on demand. A web-based platform removes this barrier without requiring VPN access or remote desktop infrastructure.

Research and teaching on the same physical infrastructure

When research projects and undergraduate teaching compete for the same physical rigs, one loses. Separating teaching onto a browser-based platform frees physical rigs for research use without scheduling conflicts.

The solution

What the Teams plan provides for universities

Simultaneous access for every licensed student

Every licensed student in a module can log in simultaneously. There is no queue or shift allocation within the seats your institution has purchased, so contact hours become a scheduling choice rather than a lab-capacity constraint.

Eight dialects for a complete control systems curriculum

IEC 61131-3 for standards literacy, Allen-Bradley for mining and manufacturing exposure, Siemens for process industry contexts — all in one platform. Mechatronics graduates who can navigate multiple vendor environments are more employable; the curriculum can reflect that without additional licenses.

40+ industrial scenarios and a fault-injection module

Fault diagnosis by logical elimination — not visual inspection — is a skill that is almost impossible to teach reliably on shared physical hardware where physical state is visible. The fault-injection module hides the fault source and requires students to diagnose through logic analysis alone.

Interview tracks for graduate readiness

Six structured interview preparation tracks give final-year students practice with a target duration and countdown before they enter the job market. Graduate outcome reporting gains a differentiator beyond pass rates.

Cohort management for large modules

The /team admin console gives demonstrators and academic staff a view of who has completed what, before due dates rather than after. Learning paths can be structured to gate advanced scenarios behind foundational completions.

Sandbox mode for postgraduate and research use

Postgraduate students investigating fault-tolerant sequencing, redundant logic, or multi-axis coordination can use sandbox mode without occupying a physical rig. Sandbox sessions are unconstrained in length and complexity.

Curriculum coverage

A control systems curriculum your students build, not just watch

Every concept below maps to a graded scenario or sandbox exercise students write and run in the browser — from first-year fundamentals through to postgraduate state-machine and structured-text work. Concurrent access is unlimited, so a 100-student module can be in the editor at the same time without a rig queue.

The PLC simulator running in a university lab browser — editor, live simulation and auto-grader in one tab for each licensed learner, no install or VPN requiredA web browser window running a PLC ladder logic simulator with an input/output strip, requiring no installation or download.plcsimulator.app/playno installINPUTSOUTPUTS
Browser-based access for each licensed learner, with no admin-locked lab machines or VPN.
PLC architecture taught in the university control systems curriculum — CPU, input and output modules and field devices — the foundational lecture conceptA modular PLC rack on a backplane: power supply, CPU processor, input module, output module and a communications module side by side.PLC RACKbackplane busPSUPowerCPUProcessorDIInputDOOutputNETComms
Lecture 1 — PLC architecture: CPU, I/O modules, and field devices.
The deterministic PLC scan cycle taught in the university control systems lab — read inputs, execute program, update outputs, repeat — the basis for real-time control analysisThe repeating PLC scan cycle: read inputs, execute the ladder logic, update outputs, then housekeeping, looping continuously.1Read Inputs2Execute Logic3Update Outputs4HousekeepingSCANCYCLE
The deterministic scan cycle — the basis for real-time control analysis.
A ladder logic rung in the university PLC simulator — a normally-open contact driving an output coil — auto-graded against test cases for large-module assessmentA basic ladder logic rung between two power rails: an examine-if-closed contact (XIC) in series driving an output coil (OTE).L1L2] [StartXIC I:0/0LampOTE O:0/0
Auto-graded rungs — assessment that scales to a 100-student cohort.
An IEC TON on-delay timer timing chart in the university control systems curriculum — timed sequencing for process and machine control exercisesA TON on-delay timer: the accumulated time bar ramps up toward the preset value, and the done (DN) bit turns on when the accumulator reaches preset.TONPRE 5000ACCACC ramps to PREPREDNdone bit
Timers — timed sequencing for process and machine control exercises.
IEC 61131-3 Structured Text in the university PLC curriculum — a high-level textual language for postgraduate state-machine and algorithmic control workA small Structured Text code block in an editor: an IF/THEN condition, a TON timer call and assignments, showing text-based PLC programming.main.st — Structured Text1IF Start AND NOT Stop THEN2 Run := TRUE;3END_IF;4DelayTmr(IN := Run, PT := T#5s);5Lamp := DelayTmr.Q;
Structured Text — for postgraduate state-machine and algorithmic control work.
The five IEC 61131-3 languages in the university control systems curriculum — Ladder, Function Block, Structured Text, SFC and Instruction List — for standards literacy and multi-vendor employabilityThe five IEC 61131-3 PLC programming languages as chips: Ladder Diagram, Function Block Diagram, Structured Text, Instruction List and Sequential Function Chart.IEC 61131-3 — five languagesLDLadder DiagramFBDFunction BlockSTStructured TextILInstruction ListSFCSequential Func. Chart
IEC 61131-3 breadth — standards literacy plus multi-vendor employability.
HMI and SCADA supervisory layer above the PLC — taught in the university control systems curriculum to connect ladder logic to plant-level monitoring and controlA SCADA supervisory layer above a PLC, an operator HMI panel beside the PLC, and the PLC wired down to field devices such as sensors and a motor.SCADAsupervisory layerHMI panelPLCcontrollerSMfield devices (sensors, motor)
The HMI / SCADA layer — connecting logic to plant-level supervision.

Pilot outcomes

What a university pilot should prove

Delivery: can licensed students reach an auto-graded pass on managed campus devices without installing vendor software or booking a physical rig?

Evidence: can teaching staff use cohort progress, attempts, and exported results to identify learners who need support before practical assessment?

Pricing

Per-seat pricing — 20% below individual Pro

Cohort sizeAnnual cost (USD)vs individual Pro ($249/seat)
30 seats$5,970 / yrSave $1,500 vs individual
60 seats$11,940 / yrSave $3,000 vs individual
120 seats$23,880 / yrSave $6,000 vs individual

Teams seats at $199/yr vs $249/yr individual Pro — approximately 20% discount. See full pricing →

What's included

Everything in the Teams plan

  • ✓Simultaneous browser access for every licensed student
  • ✓9 PLC dialects: IEC 61131-3, Allen-Bradley, Siemens, Mitsubishi, Omron, KEYENCE KV, Schneider, Delta, Instruction List
  • ✓40+ industrial scenarios with structured progression
  • ✓Fault-injection module — hidden faults requiring logical diagnosis
  • ✓55 guided learning modules from first principles
  • ✓12 graded quizzes
  • ✓6 interview preparation tracks for graduate readiness
  • ✓Sandbox mode — unconstrained for postgraduate and research use
  • ✓Portfolio PDF export per student
  • ✓/team admin console with cohort management and learning path builder
  • ✓Org-private custom scenario builder

Related institutional pages

PLC training for every kind of institution

For teams & institutions — overviewPLC simulator for TVET & vocational collegesPLC curriculum for educatorsPLC simulator for training centersBrowse the 170 scenario library
Questions

University PLC simulator FAQ

No. The platform is a substantive supplement to physical hardware, not a replacement. ECSA accreditation criteria require hands-on practical contact hours. How the platform maps to your program's graduate attributes is a decision for your program team and faculty board — we can provide documentation of platform capabilities to support that review.

Remove the rig constraint from your module.

Create a free team account and invite your module cohort. No procurement cycle. No installation. Every student on day one.

Create your team freeRequest a free pilot

Run a free class or team pilot

Use a real cohort before making a purchasing decision. Send your work email and organization; we’ll reply with a pilot plan and only ask for the details relevant to your setup.

Checking this request.

No spam. We reply within 1 business day.

Form not working? Email us directly and we’ll set it up manually.

Competency and practice field guide

PLC simulator for universities: practice plan

Direct answer

The institution can map learning outcomes to repeatable scenarios, changed-case assessment, student evidence and scheduled physical-hardware transfer.

Written for lecturers, lab managers, instructional designers and IT teams planning scalable PLC, instrumentation and industrial automation laboratory work.

adult learners and an instructor using PLC racks, laptops and a miniature process in a vocational automation lab while studying university PLC virtual labs and assessable control-systems practice
System map / 02

NODE 01observable

Scope

Program outcomes, cohort size, prerequisites, devices, accessibility, identity, privacy, LMS, academic integrity, staff load, hardware and budget.

NODE 02observable

Signal path

Learning outcome through briefing, runnable model, independent task, automated checks, instructor review and retained evidence.

NODE 03observable

Baseline practice

One complete input-logic-output-feedback task independently completed and explained against a rubric.

NODE 04observable

Edge cases

Large-cohort concurrency, solution sharing, inaccessible interaction, lost work, network outage, identity mismatch and weak transfer.

NODE 05observable

Fault practice

A curriculum, prerequisite, access, runtime, assessment, integrity, integration, support or hardware-transfer gap.

NODE 06observable

Transfer to the job

Results moderated and combined with supervised target-software and physical-lab assessment.

Answer surface / 07

How can universities run PLC labs without one hardware rack per student?

Use simulation for repeatable pre-labs, programming, changed cases and diagnostics, then schedule scarce hardware for I/O, networking, electrical and commissioning outcomes.

What should a university evaluate in a PLC simulator?

Evaluate curriculum fit, runtime behavior, accessibility, identity, privacy, evidence export, instructor workflow, concurrency, support and target-hardware transfer.

Instructor and virtual-lab path

Connect practical work to curriculum evidence

Evaluate the learner experience, map outcomes, run a representative lab and review the evidence an instructor can retain.