Pro
10 min

CCST 10 — Forward/Reverse Interlocking

ccstladderinterlockforward-reversemotor

Ready to build this?

Sign up free — no credit card required. This scenario requires the Pro plan.

Sign up to play this scenario →

Already have an account? Log in

CCST 10 — Forward/Reverse Interlocking scenario preview

Briefing

A conveyor can run FORWARD or REVERSE but never both at once. Implement electrical interlocking so FORWARD_CMD and REVERSE_CMD are mutually exclusive.

Objectives

  • FORWARD output blocked when REVERSE output is on
  • REVERSE output blocked when FORWARD output is on
  • Independent start/stop buttons for each direction

Hints

  • Series the NC contact of REVERSE in the FORWARD rung and vice-versa
  • FORWARD := (FWD_START OR FORWARD) AND NOT FWD_STOP AND NOT REVERSE
  • REVERSE := (REV_START OR REVERSE) AND NOT REV_STOP AND NOT FORWARD

I/O Table

Inputs

FWD_START

Forward start

BOOL · %I0.0

FWD_STOP

Forward stop

BOOL · %I0.1

REV_START

Reverse start

BOOL · %I0.2

REV_STOP

Reverse stop

BOOL · %I0.3

Outputs

FORWARD

Forward contactor

BOOL · %Q0.0

REVERSE

Reverse contactor

BOOL · %Q0.1

Your program will be tested against:

All test cases run automatically when you submit. Assertions are hidden until you pass.

  1. #1Forward runs on start

    Forward runs on start

  2. #2Reverse blocked when forward running

    Reverse blocked when forward running

  3. #3Reverse runs independently when forward is off

    A momentary reverse start seals in REVERSE while FORWARD remains de-energised

Ready to build this?

Sign up free — no credit card required. This scenario requires the Pro plan.

Sign up to play this scenario →

Already have an account? Log in

Job-readiness and assessment field guide

CCST practical 010 calibration assessment: readiness checklist

Direct answer

The candidate can select bounded test points, record as-found error, avoid uncontrolled adjustment, document as-left results and state remaining uncertainty.

Written for controls-technician candidates practicing a traceable calibration workflow for a representative instrument loop.

a supervised controls-technician practical assessment bench with representative instruments, motor controls and retained diagnostic evidence while studying calibration planning, reference points, tolerance and as-found versus as-left evidence
System map / 02

NODE 01observable

Role scope

Instrument identity, range, units, tolerance, reference equipment, environmental condition, test direction, as-found data, adjustment authority and as-left acceptance.

NODE 02observable

Skills map

Known reference through sensor or simulated input, transmitter, loop, receiver indication, error calculation, adjustment and retained record.

NODE 03observable

Core exercise

Multiple rising and falling points fall within the declared tolerance with identity, unit and reference evidence intact.

NODE 04observable

Stretch case

Zero shift, span error, nonlinearity, hysteresis, unstable reference, wrong range, insufficient resolution, failed point and interrupted calibration.

NODE 05observable

Troubleshooting

A reference, setup, stimulus, instrument, loop, receiver, calculation, tolerance or documentation mismatch.

NODE 06observable

Portfolio evidence

The work repeated with approved standards, traceability and site calibration procedure.

Answer surface / 07

What is the difference between as-found and as-left calibration data?

As-found records performance before adjustment; as-left records performance after authorized work and together they show whether process impact review may be needed.

How many calibration points should be tested?

Use the approved procedure and risk-based range coverage; a representative training exercise should include endpoints, intermediate points and direction where hysteresis matters.