Runnable simulator field guide
Light-curtain muting sequence scenario: test checklist
Direct answer
The learner can draw the complete state model, test every permitted and rejected sensor order and explain why acknowledgement cannot substitute for hazard clearance.
Written for pLC and safety learners examining state, timers and sensor patterns around a simulated material-transfer muting case.

Scenario setup
Simulated material path, protective field, mute sensors, expected direction, sequence states, transition timeouts, maximum mute, fault state, indication, reset eligibility and restart separation.
I/O and state map
Sensor pattern through explicit state and time guards to mute request, protective-field status, machine permission, fault latch, clearance and deliberate recovery.
Normal run
Each valid pattern enters and exits the mute once while invalid patterns reach a defined faulted or protected state.
Boundary run
Reverse order, overlap, missing sensor, blocked field, excessive duration, simultaneous change, device discrepancy, reset during demand and power return.
Injected fault
A model, sensor, state, transition, timer, mute, protective-field, fault, reset or restart mismatch.
Target check
The educational result kept separate from a qualified design and validation of the target safety function.
Why model light-curtain muting as states?
Explicit states make sensor order, timing, normal exit, fault paths and reset eligibility inspectable instead of hiding them in overlapping timer bits.
What is the difference between muting and bypass?
Muting is an automatic, monitored and bounded function for a defined condition; an uncontrolled bypass defeats protection and is not equivalent.